Quick & New -
the New Economy Ticker
The latest news, debates, proposals and developments on new economic thinking at a glance.
Topic: After COP27: What priorities for future international climate policy?
When: Thursday, 01.12.2022 | 9:00 am – 10:00 am (CET)
Where: Forum Hertie School
Keynote remarks by Laurence Tubiana (European Climate Foundation) and panel discussion with Inge Kaul (Hertie School) and Christian Flachsland (Hertie School Centre for Sustainability), with a welcome by Cornelia Woll (Hertie School). Hosted by the Centre for Sustainability.
More information here.
How to negotiate more climate protection – Article (German)
Dennis Snower, Die Zeit, 21.11.2022
It is time to explore alternatives to the world climate summits: If we tackle climate and pandemic goals in combination, new room for manoeuvre will emerge.
What is the point of working any more? – Essay (German, Paywall)
Kathrin Werner, SZ, 19.11.2022
Many people are stressed, constantly in a hurry, constantly under pressure. From the question of why we do this to ourselves and whether it can’t be done differently.
It’s the economy, stupid (but not as we thought) – It’s the economy, stupid (aber nicht so, wie wir dachten) – Opinion piece
Martin Sandbu, Financial Times, 17.11.2022
Their surprisingly good midterms should make US Democrats appreciate Bidenomics.
Collateral Damage From Higher Interest Rates – Blogpost
Servaas Storm, INET Blog, 05.11.2022
Why to Be Wary of Another Volcker-Type Monetary Tightening
Rishi Sunak: Return to austerity? – Article
Owen Jones, der Freitag, 43/2022
Liz Truss was in office for only 50 days. But even if her successor Rishi Sunak will last longer – even he will not solve the deep-rooted problems of British society. The reason: the ideology of the Tory party.
Fixing a web bug: How the stimulus component could become democratically legitimate and more sustainable – Article
Florian Schuster & Philippa Sigl-Glöckner, Wirtschaftsdienst, 102/2022
In the coalition agreement, the traffic light coalition agreed to review the cyclical adjustment procedure within the framework of the debt brake. At the centre of the process is the estimation of potential output. The procedure on which the estimation of potential output is based has been subjected to a variety of criticisms, among other things because of its procyclicality and susceptibility to revision. However, it is not enough to start with the criticism here. For before it is a question of optimising the estimation methodology, criteria should be spelled out for how it can contribute to a democratically legitimised fiscal policy.
Important parts of German industry shrink strongly – Article (Paywall, German)
Alexander Hagelüken, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 14.11.2022
Energy-intensive industries have produced more than ten percent less since the start of the Ukraine war. This could be exacerbated by political mistakes, economists warn.
An inefficient billion-dollar gift for industry – Blogpost (German)
Tom Krebs, Makronom, 15.11.2022
The gas price brake for industrial consumers recommended by the Expert Commission is good for corporations like BASF and their owners – but bad for German taxpayers.
Is climate protection a question of (re)distribution? – Podcast (German)
Henrike Adamsen & Victoria Hünewaldt, Makronom, 10.11.2022
An interview with DIW President Marcel Fratzscher on financing climate protection, the impact on different income groups and measures to tackle the energy crisis.
The EU begins to grasp its fiscal nettle – Opinion piece
Martin Sandbu, FT, 10.11.2022
New proposal accepts that budget rules must complement politics, not substitute for it.
Monika Schnitzer, head of the Council of Economic Advisors, advocates an energy soli – Article (German)
Julian Olk, Handelsblatt, 09.11.2022
The new chairwoman defends the Council of Economic Experts’ surprising proposal for tax increases – and explains how the important advisory body needs to change.
The Entrepreneurial State Must Lead on Climate Change – Article
Mariana Mazzucato, Project Syndicate, 04.11.2022
As a much-touted green alliance of financial institutions crumbles, the private sector has once again proven unequal to the task of climate leadership. The global transition to a net-zero economy simply will not happen at the pace that is needed unless states embrace their proper role as a market maker and investor in public goods.
In a new contribution, Isabella Weber and Sebastian Dullien criticise the fact that companies are allowed to “utilise their subsidised gas quota on the market”, which, according to the authors, could create an incentive to cut back on own production and focus on the more expensive resale of gas. In order to avoid this “hibernation”, they argue that the amount paid out to industrial companies should be dependent on consumption, with the incentive to save given by limiting it to 70 or 80 percent of consumption.
To really understand the dollar system and international finance, one important question to ask is how the world became so dependent on the US dollar. A new book of the INET book series and Cambridge University Press does precisely this.
Money and Empire: Charles P. Kindleberger and the Dollar System, by Boston University economics professor Perry Mehrling, outlines the evolution of Kindleberger’s economic thought in the context of a ‘key-currency’ approach to the rise of the dollar system, which served as the indispensable framework for global economic development since World War II.
The book is a biography of both the dollar and a man, telling the story of the development of ideas about how money works and the rise of the dollar system, which contrasts with the more common myth of multilateralism at Bretton Woods.
As Adam Tooze observes in his review of the book, Kindleberger understood money and banking as inherently transnational, with ownership, accounting and control dispersed in space. This understanding of global credit creation is somewhat at odds with the intermediation view on banks underlying the work of this year’s “Nobel” prize winners. When Ben Bernanke asked Kindleberger for a comment on his paper Non-Monetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression (1983), he received the following reply, which underlines the degree of intellectual disagreement: “I think you have provided a most ingenious solution to a non-problem.” Read the whole reply here.
OUR MAIN TOPICS
New Paradigm
NEW PARADIGM
After decades of overly naive market belief, we urgently need new answers to the great challenges of our time. More so, we need a whole new paradigm to guide us. We collect everything about the people and the community who are dealing with the question of a new paradigm and who analyze the historical and present impact of paradigms and narratives – whether in new contributions, performances, books and events.
Redefining
the role of
the state
REDEFINING
THE ROLE OF
THE STATE
For decades, there was a consensus that reducing the role of the state and cutting public debt would generate wealth. This contributed to a chronic underinvestment in education and public infrastructure. New research focuses on establishing when and how governments need to intervene to better contribute to long-term prosperity and to stabilize rather than aggravate economic fluctuations.
Remaking
finance
REMAKING
FINANCE
More than a decade after the financial crisis there still seems to be something seriously wrong with the financial system. Financial markets still tend to periodically misprice risk and contribute to boom and bust cycles. A better financial system needs to discourage short-termism and speculative activity, curtail systemic risk and distribute wealth more broadly.
Greening
prosperity
GREENING
PROSPERITY
During the high point of market orthodoxy, economists argued that the most 'efficient' way to combat climate change was to simply let markets determine the price of carbon emissions. Today, there is a growing consensus that prices need to be regulated and that a carbon price on its own might not be enough.
Reducing
inequality
REDUCING
INEQUALITY
The rising gap between rich and poor has become a threat to social cohesion in most rich countries. To reverse this trend it will be crucial to better understand the importance of different drivers of income and wealth inequality.
Innovation Lab
INNOVATION LAB
Do we need a whole new understanding of economic growth? What would be a real alternative? How viable are alternatives to GDP when it comes to measuring prosperity? These and other more fundamental challenges are what this section is about.
Globalization
for all
GLOBALIZATION
FOR ALL
After three decades of poorly managed integration, globalization is threatened by social discontent and the rise of populist forces. A new paradigm will need better ways not only to compensate the groups that have lost, but to distribute the gains more broadly from the start.
Europe
beyond markets
EUROPE
BEYOND MARKETS
The euro was planned during a period in which economic policy making was driven by a deep belief in market liberalism and the near impossibility of systemic financial crises. This belief has been brought into question since the euro crisis, which showed that panics do happen. New thinking needs to focus on developing mechanisms to protect eurozone countries from such panics and to foster economic convergence between members.
Corona Crisis
CORONA CRISIS
The current Corona crisis is probably the worst economic crisis of the post-World War 2 era. Economists are working hard on mitigating the economic effects caused by COVID-19 to prevent a second Great Depression, the break-up of the Eurozone and the end of globalisation. We collect the most important contributions.