New Economy in Progress

Inequality is a political choice, produces discontent and can even lead to financial instability.

Leider ist der Eintrag nur auf Amerikanisches Englisch verfügbar.

Read Part 2: Reducing Inequality: What went wrong?

Read Part 3: Reducing Inequality: New Economy in Progress

Until recently, economists have not paid much attention to inequality. The mainstream view was most notoriously stated by Robert Lucas (2004): „Of the tendencies that are harmful to sound economics, the most seductive, and in my opinion the most poisonous, is to focus on questions of distribution.”

But with inequality reaching seemingly unacceptable levels and the negative effects of inequality becoming more visible, this view seems to have been misguided. Rather, it seems that as long as capitalists used their surplus income not to consume but to invest, the social contract held (Milanovic, 2019). Today’s developments, however, suggest that the social contract no longer holds.

New research discusses a variety of tools to combat inequality. Yet, which policy to choose in the fight against inequality may depend on the drivers underlying the dynamics of inequality.

This is a list of policy tools that have been suggested as remedies against rising by becoming part of a possible new paradigm:

  • Global Wealth Tax: A wealth tax is potentially a very effective tool in the fight against wealth inequality. Economists such as Saez and Zucman (2019) have argued for a high wealth tax in the US. However, because many wealthy households hold part of their portfolios and bonds in offshore locations and tax havens, a thorough assessment on what to tax might be difficult. In addition, wealthy individuals might relocate their residence to countries with low or no wealth or income taxes. Other economists have therefore proposed a more ambitious plan of a global wealth tax (Piketty, 2014).
  • High inheritance tax: Renowned personalities such as Steve Jobs or Bill Gates are the incarnation of the American Dream. Yet, the story that any person can rise to the wealthiest 1% through their own efforts is less true today than 40 years ago. Instead, wealth is often passed on to the next generation of one’s family. Because the rate of return on capital seems to be higher than the growth rate in the economy, the wealth of these households may be increasing without any income actually generated from their own labor (Piketty, 2014). For this and other reasons, some economists have argued in favor of an inheritance tax to combat wealth inequality (Atkinson, 2015).
  • Expand employee stock ownership plans: Some economists have argued that workers should be compensated through mechanisms such as stock ownership plans. The idea behind such policies is that workers become the owners of the companies in which they work. It is hoped that this would help to deconcentrate capital ownership. This may be particularly relevant for Germany, where buying stocks is not very common among the average population because it is usually confined to a small group at the top of the income and wealth distribution (Milanovic, 2017).
  • Sanctions against non-cooperative tax havens: One reason why the top 1% today pay a lower tax rate than the bottom 50% is that they can employ services from the financial industry which help them move parts of their portfolio to offshore locations and tax havens. Some economists have therefore argued that governments should impose sanctions on intermediaries or countries that facilitate tax evasion (Zucman, 2018).
  • Net wealth tax: Whereas in 1990, twelve OECD countries levied taxes on individual net wealth, in 2017 only four countries still had a net wealth tax. Today, there is renewed interest in wealth taxation among politicians. In the US, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have each put forward proposals for a wealth tax. The concept of a net wealth tax has received support from UC Berkley economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman (2019). Others, however, have argued that from both an equity and efficiency perspective, there are limited arguments for having a net wealth tax and that other taxes such as an inheritance tax, a capital income tax or a gift tax would be more effective(OECD, 2018).
  • Investment in education: Some economists have argued that we cannot rely on taxes to always compensate the market-driven process of increasing wealth inequality. In order to achieve equal opportunities, Marcel Fratzscher from DIW Berlin has argued in his basic research paper for the Forum New Economy that it will be necessary to invest more in education (Fratzscher, 2016).
  • Land tax: The classical economist David Ricardo (1817) famously argued that in the long run, landlords disproportionally profit from economic growth. Since land is a fixed factor and highly unequally distributed across the population, market-based systems tend to produce inequality. Land-value taxation may thus be an adequate policy tool. Indeed, the idea of taxing land has a long tradition in the US, going back to the famous political economist Henry George (1879). In modern times, there has also been renewed advocacy among Europeans, such as Financial Times journalist Martin Wolf, for the introduction or increase in land taxation (Wolf, 2006).

This knowledge base tries to summarize the broad lines of the paradigm debate for a broader public. The goal is to continuously expand and improve the knowledge base as it becomes progressively clearer what a new paradigm could consist of.

Referenzen

  • Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic literature, 37(4), 1615-60.
  • Albers, T., Bartels, C., & Schularick, M. (2019). Wealth inequality in Germany, 1895-2017.
  • Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European economic review, 40(6), 1203-28.
  • Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (Eds.). (2018). World inequality report 2018. Belknap Press.
  • Atkinson, A (2015), Inequality: What can be done? Harvard University Press.
  • Baldenius, T., Kohl, S., & Schularick, M. (2019). Die neue Wohnungsfrage: Gewinner und Verlierer des deutschen Immobilienbooms.
  • Bartels, C. (2019). Top incomes in Germany, 1871–2014. The Journal of Economic History, 79(3), 669-707.
  • Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2017). Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy, 32(92), 601-50.
  • Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2016). Trickle-down consumption. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(5), 863-79.
  • Blanchflower, D. G. (2019). Not Working: Where Have All the Good Jobs Gone? Princeton University Press.
  • Cingano, F. (2014). Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en.
  • Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., & Zimmermann, M. (2018). Housing expenditures and income inequality. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (48).
  • Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2004). Do the rich save more? Journal of political economy, 112(2), 397-444.
  • Dynan, K. (2012). Is a household debt overhang holding back consumption? [with comments and discussion]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 299-362.
  • Ferguson, T., Page, B., Rothschild, J., Chang, A., & Chen, J. (2018). The Economic and Social Roots of Populist Rebellion: Support for Donald Trump in 2016. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, (83).
  • Fratzscher, M. (2016). Verteilungskampf: Warum Deutschland immer ungleicher wird. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG.
  • Grabka, M. M., Goebel, J., & Liebig, S. (2019). Wiederanstieg der Einkommensungleichheit: Aber auch deutlich steigende Realeinkommen. DIW-Wochenbericht, 86(19), 343-53.
  • Juhn, C., Murphy, K. M., & Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of political Economy, 101(3), 410-42.
  • Katz, L. F. (1999). Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In Handbook of labor economics, Vol. 3, 1463-55.
  • Kuhn, M., Schularick M., & Steins, U. I. (2019). Income and Wealth Inequality in America, 1949-2013. Forthcoming in Journal of political Economy.
  • Kumhof, M., Rancière, R., & Winant, P. (2015). Inequality, leverage, and crises. American Economic Review, 105(3), 1217-45.
  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review, 45(1), 1-28.
  • Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2011). House prices, home equity-based borrowing, and the US household leverage crisis. American Economic Review, 101(5), 2132-56.
  • Mian, A., Rao, K., & Sufi, A. (2013). Household balance sheets, consumption, and the economic slump. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1687-1726.
  • Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2018). Finance and business cycles: The credit-driven household demand channel. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 31-58.
  • Milanovic, B. (2017). Rising capital share and transmission into higher interpersonal inequality. https://voxeu.org/article/reducing-inequality-deconcentrating-capital.
  • Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, Alone: The Future of the System That Rules the World. Harvard University Press.
  • OECD. (2018). The role and design of net wealth taxes in the OECD.
  • Ostry, M. J. D., Berg, M. A., & Tsangarides, M. C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. International Monetary Fund.
  • Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic growth, 1(2), 149-87.
  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017). Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 553-609.
  • Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 519-78.
  • Spannagel D., & Molitor, K. (2019). Einkommen immer ungleicher verteilt. WSI-Verteilungsbericht 2019, Report Nr. 53, October 2019.
  • World Bank, Development Research Group. World Bank GINI index (World Bank estimate) – Germany, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=DE.
  • Wolf, M. (2006). A strong case for a tax on land values, Financial Times, 5 January 2006. https://www.ft.com/content/8fd9aa52-7e21-11da-8ef9-0000779e2340.
  • Zidar, O. (2019). Tax cuts for whom? Heterogeneous effects of income tax changes on growth and employment. Journal of Political Economy, 127(3), 1437-72.
  • Zucman, G. (2018). If Ronaldo can’t beat Uruguay, the least he can do is pay taxes, New York Times, 3 July 2018.

Diese Webseite verwendet u.a. Cookies zur Analyse und Verbesserung der Webseite, zum Ausspielen personalisierter Anzeigen und zum Teilen von Artikeln in sozialen Netzwerken. Unter Datenschutz erhalten Sie weitere Informationen und Möglichkeiten, diese Cookies auszuschalten.